Houses are still selling swiftly in East Bay. Limited inventory means that sellers are still experiencing the joy of multiple offers. Unfortunately, spirits are sometimes dampened by low-ball appraisals. Houses get into contract for a fair price, dictated by willing buyers bidding in an open market. This contract price is often diminished through the appraisal process when conservative appraisers are pressed by ridiculously conservative banks.
It's a tough job for appraisers. They have new guidelines for justifying their conclusions of value. They are being asked to provide a greater number of comparable sold properties than they have needed in the past. In addition, the timeline for these qualifying properties has shrunk from data collected within the last six months down to three. Geographical requirements have also been tightened. Some lenders are requesting comparable sales within 1/2 mile radius of the subject property. This process is complicated by our limited housing inventory and low sales volume. In short, appraisers are now required to produce more data, while obeying stricter guidelines, in a market with less turnover.
At the center of this debate is The Home Valuation Code of Conduct ("HVCC"). HVCC regulations prohibit lenders and Realtors from choosing or directly communicating with the appraisers. This means that sometimes out-of-area appraisers are chosen at random and are working to justify home values in a market they do not understand. Due to resulting low appraisals, legitimate loans are being turned down and Bay Area buyers turned away (with dreams crushed.) You can help by signing the petition, Request For Reconsideration of HVCC.
Note: When an appraisal comes in low, the buyer (with an appraisal contingency) can cancel their offer, try to renegotiate with the seller or elect to proceed under the original contract terms. Often the original price is the fair price. Yet, it is difficult for buyers to feel confident paying a price that the "expert", in this case the appraiser, tells them is high.
Showing posts with label Home Appraisals. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Home Appraisals. Show all posts
Friday, June 5, 2009
Wednesday, March 26, 2008
Appraising the Current Market Situation
by Arlene Baxter
Today our Berkeley Association of Realtors auditorium was packed to capacity with Realtors wanting to get the latest information on the status of loan availability and appraisal conditions in this changing market. Our speakers, one representative each from the mortgage and appraisal industries, confirmed what we’d been hearing anecdotally from our colleagues. Loans were super abundant a year ago, with everyone knowing someone moonlighting as a loan broker who could get you “such a deal!” Last summer came the implosion of sub-prime lending and the virtual disappearance of jumbo loan products, those loans larger than $417K. Fast forward to our current state. The pendulum has swung so far that now folks with a fully documented loan application may have great difficulty getting financing if they have less than 20% down, gorgeous credit scores, and substantial assets. Buyers who can stay within the limit of a $417K loan can still get very attractive rates, today at the 5.5% level. But buyers who need to borrow amounts up to the new “super-conforming” limit of $729,750 need to be prepared for much stiffer requirements (see FHA and Freddie Mac Daddy from March 6th, below).
One of the elements of loan approval that has been mostly in the background up until now is the appraisal process. In our area we have for more than a decade been able to assume that homes would appraise for their contract value, except in the rarest of circumstances. If a property had multiple offers, as so many did, that was a strong argument in determining that market forces were setting value, and that we were in an area of increasing values. Lenders allowed appraisers to use closed sales back as far as six months, and there was reasonable flexibility to use properties that shared a similar characteristic to the subject property, even if they weren’t in the same neighborhood.
The job of the appraiser has changed dramatically over the past few months. Marian Huntoon, the owner of Real Valuation in Berkeley, spoke to our Association today about the intensity of scrutiny that appraisers must now face. Lenders want to see properties used as comparables that sold within three months or less, and they insist on having both an active and a pending sale in the same neighborhood. Appraisers are now routinely making significant adjustments to value in order to use “comparable” properties that are really not very comparable at all. Marian estimated that it takes appraisers anywhere from twice as long to four times as long as a year ago to complete an appraisal report that is acceptable to the lender. Appraisal reports are now routinely sent back to appraisers with the request that additional adjustments be made to reflect declining market conditions. That is really a loaded phrase. Lenders are now reviewing market conditions with an extremely broad brush, defining the direction of the market by county, not by city, nor by neighborhood. Those of us who are actively representing clients in this area know that we are still seeing multiple offers on many properties in the most desirable neighborhoods. We are back to seeing pre-emptive offers both in the modest and in the most expensive price ranges. So to have both Alameda and Contra Costa Counties defined as a whole as “declining market conditions” makes us all a bit crazy. Explain that to my buyer who lost out in fairly modest competition of only four offers. He still didn’t get the house he loved! And then there was the James house, receiving 17 offers last week after only one Sunday open house (see our March 14th entry below).
But it is also true that there are properties sitting for a few weeks before they sell, as opposed to selling according to a pre-established seven or ten-day schedule. And then, even in some of our most desirable neighborhoods, there are the short sales, trust sales and foreclosures. Those are topics for another day!
Tip for Home Sellers: Review carefully with your listing agent what the recent sales have been, closest to your home both in location and style. Try to step back and look at the data the way both buyers and appraisers will now be forced to look: at currently active homes, those recently pending, and the sales back only a very few months. Even if some buyers might be willing to offer a very high price, unless they have unusually high cash reserves to make up the difference, most buyers will need to have your home appraise very close to their offer, in order for the contract to close. Sellers should come to expect to see both financing and appraisal contingencies in the majority of offers, rather than assuming that buyers will waive those contingencies in order to have their offer accepted. The goal is not receiving and accepting a very high offer. The goal is, and really always has been, to close the escrow, and at an acceptable price.
Today our Berkeley Association of Realtors auditorium was packed to capacity with Realtors wanting to get the latest information on the status of loan availability and appraisal conditions in this changing market. Our speakers, one representative each from the mortgage and appraisal industries, confirmed what we’d been hearing anecdotally from our colleagues. Loans were super abundant a year ago, with everyone knowing someone moonlighting as a loan broker who could get you “such a deal!” Last summer came the implosion of sub-prime lending and the virtual disappearance of jumbo loan products, those loans larger than $417K. Fast forward to our current state. The pendulum has swung so far that now folks with a fully documented loan application may have great difficulty getting financing if they have less than 20% down, gorgeous credit scores, and substantial assets. Buyers who can stay within the limit of a $417K loan can still get very attractive rates, today at the 5.5% level. But buyers who need to borrow amounts up to the new “super-conforming” limit of $729,750 need to be prepared for much stiffer requirements (see FHA and Freddie Mac Daddy from March 6th, below).
One of the elements of loan approval that has been mostly in the background up until now is the appraisal process. In our area we have for more than a decade been able to assume that homes would appraise for their contract value, except in the rarest of circumstances. If a property had multiple offers, as so many did, that was a strong argument in determining that market forces were setting value, and that we were in an area of increasing values. Lenders allowed appraisers to use closed sales back as far as six months, and there was reasonable flexibility to use properties that shared a similar characteristic to the subject property, even if they weren’t in the same neighborhood.
The job of the appraiser has changed dramatically over the past few months. Marian Huntoon, the owner of Real Valuation in Berkeley, spoke to our Association today about the intensity of scrutiny that appraisers must now face. Lenders want to see properties used as comparables that sold within three months or less, and they insist on having both an active and a pending sale in the same neighborhood. Appraisers are now routinely making significant adjustments to value in order to use “comparable” properties that are really not very comparable at all. Marian estimated that it takes appraisers anywhere from twice as long to four times as long as a year ago to complete an appraisal report that is acceptable to the lender. Appraisal reports are now routinely sent back to appraisers with the request that additional adjustments be made to reflect declining market conditions. That is really a loaded phrase. Lenders are now reviewing market conditions with an extremely broad brush, defining the direction of the market by county, not by city, nor by neighborhood. Those of us who are actively representing clients in this area know that we are still seeing multiple offers on many properties in the most desirable neighborhoods. We are back to seeing pre-emptive offers both in the modest and in the most expensive price ranges. So to have both Alameda and Contra Costa Counties defined as a whole as “declining market conditions” makes us all a bit crazy. Explain that to my buyer who lost out in fairly modest competition of only four offers. He still didn’t get the house he loved! And then there was the James house, receiving 17 offers last week after only one Sunday open house (see our March 14th entry below).
But it is also true that there are properties sitting for a few weeks before they sell, as opposed to selling according to a pre-established seven or ten-day schedule. And then, even in some of our most desirable neighborhoods, there are the short sales, trust sales and foreclosures. Those are topics for another day!
Tip for Home Sellers: Review carefully with your listing agent what the recent sales have been, closest to your home both in location and style. Try to step back and look at the data the way both buyers and appraisers will now be forced to look: at currently active homes, those recently pending, and the sales back only a very few months. Even if some buyers might be willing to offer a very high price, unless they have unusually high cash reserves to make up the difference, most buyers will need to have your home appraise very close to their offer, in order for the contract to close. Sellers should come to expect to see both financing and appraisal contingencies in the majority of offers, rather than assuming that buyers will waive those contingencies in order to have their offer accepted. The goal is not receiving and accepting a very high offer. The goal is, and really always has been, to close the escrow, and at an acceptable price.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)